The Court held that SIM cards, recharge coupons, and value-added telecom services are not “goods” under the KVAT Act. VAT demands on such receipts were therefore set aside.
The Court accepted that stereo systems installed in e-rickshaws qualify as inputs used in the course of business. Refund of unutilised ITC under the inverted duty structure was directed.
The court examined whether earlier liquidation orders could be recalled in light of a sanctioned revival proposal. It held that recall was justified after the holding company undertook full liability and the Government raised no objection.
The High Court held that arrest made before the time fixed in a statutory appearance notice violated mandatory procedure. The ruling clarifies that such non-compliance renders the arrest infirm, justifying grant of bail.
The issue was whether a company officer could be penalised for abetment of duty evasion. The Tribunal held that in the absence of evidence showing knowledge or intentional aid, penalty under Section 112(a) could not be sustained.
The Tribunal held that customs and excise dues of a company in liquidation cannot be recovered from auction purchasers of its assets. Pre-liquidation liabilities must be settled under the Companies Act, not through recovery from buyers.
The High Court declined to rule on the validity of the import ceiling and instead directed DGFT to examine the trader’s challenge. The authority must decide the issue by a reasoned order within a fixed timeframe.
The Court ruled that GST registration cancelled for six months’ non-filing need not be final where the taxpayer later files returns and pays dues. Authorities must consider restoration applications made within the time granted by the Court.
The Court noted NCLT approval of a settlement scheme but held that existing attachment orders under PMLA would continue unless modified by competent authorities.
The Court examined whether an order rejecting a resolution plan could be appealed under the IBC. It held that appeals lie against both approval and rejection orders, directing parties to approach NCLAT instead of invoking writ jurisdiction.
