Supreme Court declines judicial intervention in GST registration, emphasizing policy decisions rest with the government and legislature.
SC rules that land purchase and sale by developers constitute transfer of title, not taxable real estate services, dismissing the Revenue’s service tax demand.
High Court refused to entertain a writ petition challenging a GST demand involving alleged fraudulent ITC, holding that disputed facts must be resolved through the statutory appeal process.
The Court held that amounts paid under protest before assessment must be considered when calculating the 10% pre-deposit required under Section 26(6A) of the MVAT Act. The ruling restores the appeal and confirms that the statute must be interpreted strictly as written.
The Tribunal held that Section 87A contains no exclusion for long-term capital gains and allowed the rebate since total income remained below Rs.5 lakhs. The order of the lower authorities was set aside.
The Bombay High Court ruled that the CIT cannot exercise revision powers under Section 263 when the Assessing Officer has verified the identity, source, and creditworthiness of foreign donors and satisfied with gifts received.
The J&K High Court directed restoration of GST registration for a petitioner who undertook to deposit taxes, penalties, and interest, after prior cancellation for non-response to a show-cause notice.
Authorities imposed penalties after finding continued failure to file financial statements for FY 2019-20. The order directs rectification, personal payment by officers, and outlines appeal and compliance requirements.
ROC held that company failed to file financial statements for FY 2021-22 and imposed penalties on entity and its directors. Order directs rectification and payment within 90 days.
The ROC penalised the company and directors for not filing financial statements for FY 2020-21. The order highlights statutory penalties, compliance directives, and timelines for rectification.
