Indian tax residents must report foreign assets and income in their ITRs, regardless of value. Non-disclosure can lead to severe penalties under the Income Tax Act and Black Money Act, including significant fines and imprisonment, due to international Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) agreements
RBI directs regulated entities to update compliance systems under UAPA after UNSC adds Abubakar Swalleh to ISIL sanctions list on June 16, 2025.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has officially included NSDL Payments Bank Limited in the Second Schedule of the RBI Act, 1934, effective June 19, 2025.
National Financial Reporting Authority seeks advocates for empanelment to represent it in courts and tribunals, covering litigation, drafting, and legal opinions.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) designates Special Courts in Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh for the speedy trial of offenses under Section 435 of the Companies Act, 2013, as per a June 18, 2025 notification.
ITAT Jaipur held that denial of exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act for non-filing of return before due date prescribed u/s. 139(1) not justified since aggregate annual receipts doesn’t exceed specified limit. Accordingly, exemption granted and appeal allowed.
Raj Kumar Bothra Vs DCIT (Chhattisgarh High Court) AO should not have resorted to section 143(1) (a) and instead could have resorted to section 143 (3): Chhathisgarh HC The Chhattisgarh High Court, in the case of Raj Kumar Bothra vs. DCIT, has ruled that an Assessing Officer (AO) should not have resorted to Section 143(1)(a) […]
All these appeals were filed for AY 1991-92. Appellants were shareholders in the company. Earlier all three share holders were successful before CIT (A). Appeal were filed before tribunal. The sole legal issues that arises relates to the computation of cost of acquisition under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, an asset distributed on liquidation of the Company, the asset being the immovable property at 552, Mount Road, Madras that belonged to the Company. The appellants had purchased 120 shares of the Company at the rate of Rs.21,000/- per share in the Company. The Company went into voluntary liquidation on 21.05.1990.
In the matter above-mentioned NCLAT have held that pre-existing dispute between the ex-director and its management company, could not have been resolved by the NCLT under the Code.
Clause (ix) of the Explanation to Section 153B could not be invoked to exclude the period of reference under the Indo-Swiss DTAA, if the reference itself was invalid. Thus, no request could be made by Department for information relating to period prior to 01.04.2011 in terms of the Indo-Swiss DTAA.
