Karnataka High Court allows Vaishan Traders to contest discrepancies in GST seizure case, directing compliance with the hearing notice. Read the case summary here.
There has been contraventions of provisions of the GST Act for which the petitioner is liable to make good the non-payment and also suffer penal consequences for the same.
Orissa High Court stays order in Coastal Construction’s GST dispute over ₹37 lakh ITC reversal. Case involves tax period 2017-18 and SCN errors.
PCIT observed that no agricultural activity was carried out from the year 2014 till 2018 in both the lands i.e. the agricultural land which was transferred by the assessee and also the land which was purchased by the assessee.
In the matter abovementioned HC quashed the impugned order after observing that no proper and prior SCN u/s 73 (1) of AGST was issued along with the Summary of Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01.
It is submitted on behalf of assessee that he is engaged in the business of transportation and logistics services and such business is being conducted by the assessee in his personal capacity as well as in capacity of the Proprietor of “M/s Tanvi Roadways”.
Union Budget 2025 overlooked critical tax compliance issues, including TDS on partners’ salary, delays in appeals, marginal relief, and revisions under sections 68–69F.
ITAT Ahmedabad directs reassessment of a ₹44 lakh discrepancy in agricultural income, questioning the Income Tax Department’s examination of the assessee’s operations.
The Finance Bill 2025 rationalizes tax loss carry forward rules under M&A by limiting it to 8 years from the original computation year.
ITAT Bangalore held that matter of rejection of registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act is liable to be restored back to CIT(Exemptions) for granting one more opportunity as assessee failed to represent its case properly before the authorities.
