Explore modes of service of GST notices under Section 169 of the CGST Act, 2017, including electronic and physical delivery. Learn about implications for compliance.
ITAT Kolkata held that imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act justified as no plausible explanation was given by the assessee for non-compliance of notices served by AO.
The appellants had filed a refund claim with Assistant Commissioner of Customs (CRS), Visakhapatnam for Rs.5,03,984/- on 10.08.2023. The said refund claim was that the appellant had paid the Duty twice due to ‘ICEGATE error’.
Delhi High Court observed that once the DGFT had proceeded to issue the MEIS scrip to the writ petitioners, they would have been justified in assuming that the issue of classification was neither questioned nor doubted.
CA Jai Kumar Mansharamani has been reprimanded and fined ₹25,000 by the ICAI Disciplinary Committee for conflicts of interest while auditing a company.
Join us on 8th Dec for a live webinar on GST and corporate guarantees. Learn valuation, co-guarantor liability, cross-border impacts, and practical examples.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules that service tax cannot be demanded when tax liability is already settled under Reverse Charge Mechanism.
UP AAAR rules that cream made from 23% vegetable fat is classifiable under HSN 1517 90 90, attracting GST at 5%.
CESTAT Chennai held that insulin manufactured using r-DNA technology would qualify as a mono component insulin and hence benefit of exemption notification under Notification No. 12/2012 – Cus. dated 17.03.2012 available.
SC affirms the fundamental right to legal aid for accused, stresses prosecutors’ role in ensuring fair trials, and issues directions for legal aid lawyer appointments.
