Delhi High Court’s ruling in VAB Apparel LLP vs Commissioner, setting aside GST registration cancellation order for non-specification of reasons for GST registration cancellation.
ITAT Mumbai held that as the assessee should be aware of the exact charge for which the penalty proceeding has been initiated, non-striking on the irrelevant limb under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act vitiates the entire penalty proceedings.
Kerala High Court held that addition to the capital account of the partner duly sustainable in law on account of failure of the assessee to furnish supporting evidence.
Delhi High Court held that there was no default in payment of advance as seized cash was offered by the assessee to be treated as advance tax.
ITAT Bangalore held that initiation of proceedings against the person other than the searched person under section 148, instead of section 153C, of the Income Tax Act is without any jurisdiction and hence held liable to be set aside.
Madras High Court held that as GST registration sought from retrospective date, the input tax credit ought to have provided. Accordingly, impugned order directing to forego Input Tax Credit is unreasonable and cannot be sustained.
Unlock project success with strategic contract selection. Explore fixed-price, cost-reimbursement, and time & materials contracts. Choose wisely for optimal outcomes.
Uncover the Delhi HC ruling on unspent funds from FCRA suspensions with this blog post. Learn about the CPR application for utilization of 25% of foreign contributions.
Dive into Viswkarma Furniture’s legal battle against U.P.G.S.T. Act. Analysis of orders, violation of Section 75(4), and court’s directive for a fresh notice.
Explore Nagarjuna Agro Chemicals Pvt.Ltd. vs. State of U.P. case. Analysis of Allahabad HC judgment on Section 61(3) notice in GST, Section 74 implications & petitioner’s remedy.
