Learn about the Director Identification Number (DIN) system in India, its provisions, the prohibition on holding multiple DINs, and the consequences of non-compliance.
In a recent Delhi High Court ruling, it is established that rejecting a lower TDS rate application necessitates a well-reasoned order. Explore case of Shreyash Retail Private Ltd vs. DCIT TDS Circle.
2 Factor Authentication is mandatory for taxpayers with AATO Rs 20 Crore and above from 20th November 2023. Users are requested to register for 2FA and also create sub-users so that EWB activities are managed without any problem. Please read the note for more information. National Informatics Centre 2- Factor Authentication for e-Way Bill and e- Invoice System […]
Understand the significance of Rule 20(1) in GST registration cancellation. Explore the intricacies of revoking cancelled registrations, including timelines for application submission, proper officer responses, and the disposal of revocation applications. Learn about Rule 20(1) requirements and its impact on maintaining accurate GST databases.
Addition under section 69A was not justified as AO had not brought on record any material in support of the addition made by him nor he provided any basis for arriving at the basis, particularly when all the 30 flats had not been sold during the year relevant to AY 2017-18, therefore, there was no basis for arriving at the conclusion that assessee had received any on-money.
Since there was no DIN mentioned in the assessment order which was contrary to the CBDT Circular No.19/2019 dated 14th August 2019, therefore, the jurisdiction assumed was invalid as generation of DIN subsequently and generation of intimation to be sent to assessee were of no consequence for the purpose of assessment and raising the demand.
Dive into the world of debit and credit in banking and accounting. Learn what these terms mean, how they affect transactions, and their historical significance.
Interest was not payable accumulated CENVAT credit lying unutilized as in case of export of services under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, assessee was free to take back the credit of not sanctioned / partially sanctioned refunds.
Detailed analysis of Gujarat High Court’s judgment in Bharatkumar Pravinkumar & Co. vs. State of Gujarat regarding seizure of cash under GST Act.
Madras High Court case highlights importance of complying with Rule 88C of the CGST Rules to effect recovery based on difference in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B. Madras High Court allowed the writ petition in M/s. Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner Chennai, ruling that no recovery could be effected without complying with rule 88C of the CGST Rules.
