Read the full text of the ex-parte order issued by ITAT Mumbai in the case of Smt. Dakuben Saremalji Sancheti Nadol Charitable Trust vs National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC). The order reinstates the appeal to CIT(A) for assessment year 2020-21, considering Covid and software issues.
Explore the decisive ruling by the CESTAT Ahmedabad in the Thakarshi J Likhiya Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST case, focusing on the invocation of the extended period of limitation in service tax demand.
Delhi High Court scrutinizes the validity of Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) held by Vodafone Mauritius in their tax litigation case against ACIT Circle International Tax.
A comprehensive review and analysis of the SEBI circular implementing the upstreaming of clients’ funds by Stock Brokers and Clearing Members. Gain insights into regulatory changes and their implications.
In a recent judgement, the Calcutta High Court ordered the release of detained tea consignment belonging to Radha Tea Merchant. The case involved smuggled poppy seeds but found no evidence of the supplier’s involvement. Discover more about this case.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of Sun Pharmaceuticals, determining that the valuation of physician samples is governed by Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Discover the details and implications of this landmark case.
Discover the CESTAT Ahmedabad verdict on the case of S A Engineering Works Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST. Learn how lack of evidence led to a ruling in favor of the appellant.
CBDT issues Circular No. 10/2023 dated 30/06/2023 containing Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for removal of difficulty on issues pertaining to TCS on LRS and purchase of overseas tour program package. F. No. 370142/23/2023-TPL Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes (TPL Division) New Delhi Circular No. 10 of […]
Madras High Court condones a minor two-day delay in manual GST appeal filing for Isha Scraps, emphasizing judicial flexibility and the importance of valid justifications.
ITAT Mumbai declares that National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) cannot adjudicate appeals already disposed of by CIT(A). This landmark ruling also directed the Department to bear the litigation cost. Read our analysis here.
