Analyzing the Calcutta High Court’s verdict in the Kohlbros Wireless Solutions LLP vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation case, upholding the Corporation’s right to recover property tax dues based on the area actually in possession.
The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of Shree Swaminarayan Bhagwan, a religious trust, exempting a gold donation from tax under Section 11(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act. The gold donation was utilized for the creation of an art gallery, thereby qualifying as corpus donation.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance of Director’s education expenditure u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act sustained as assessee failed to prove such expenditure had direct relationship with the business activity. Accordingly, assessee failed to prove that expenditure were incurred wholly and exclusively for business.
Karnataka High Court held that notice issued in the name of non-existing entity as on the date of issuance of notice is liable to be set aside
The ITAT Mumbai ruled that no legal suit or proceeding can continue against a corporate debtor until the conclusion of proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016.
Delve into the recent ruling by the Bombay High Court on the maintainability of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the initiation of proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
ITAT held that the assessing officer’s use of Section 154 before 12.10.2022 to disallow EPF and ESI contributions was not justified, as the issue was debatable and there were conflicting views and such views.
Exploring recent decision of ITAT Mumbai in Rasik Nemchand Pethad Vs DCIT where it was determined that Section 271B penalty doesn’t apply when there’s reasonable cause for failure to comply with provisions.
Learn about the significant ruling of ITAT Ahmedabad in the case of Ankit Ashok Savla Vs ITO regarding the non-disallowance of interest expenses under Section 57 of the Income Tax Act.
upreme Court in Coal India Limited v. CCI (SC), CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2845 of 2017, June 15, 2023 categorically held that the Competition Act does apply to Coal India Limited, providing the rationale for its decision.
