As per Section 90 of Companies Act, 2013, every individual, who acting alone or together, or through one or more persons or trust, including a trust and person’s resident outside India, has (indirectly or indirect with direct holdings) following rights in reporting company:
Forms for carrying out settlement of arrears under Relevant Act, in respect of the period ending on or before the 30th June 2017 – Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fee Act, 2023
Explore the legal landscape of maternity benefits and paternity leave in India through a fictional story of advocacy. Bridging gender disparities and fostering equality in the workplace.
Get clarity on trademarks! Debunk common myths and misconceptions surrounding trademark registration. Understand the importance of protecting your brand identity and intellectual property.
PCIT Vs Abhisar Buildwell P Ltd (Supreme Court of India) Revenue files MA in SC seeking clarification regarding applicability of judgement in the light of provisions of Section 150 of IT Act 1961 After the judgement of Supreme Court in the case of Abhisar Buildwell Pvt ltd was announced on 24th April, 2023, the Income-tax […]
SSB Petro Products & Ors Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) Hon’ble Division Bench of Calcutta High Court on 21.04.2023 passed the order and restored the appeal considering the facts and circumstances of the case. The Respondent no.1 issued notice in DRC-01A through email and the petitioner submitted reply through email and thereafter 1st Respondent […]
Assessees could not claim cost of improvement and indexation cost as assessee had to furnish some evidence and in the absence of any evidence or information, the information contained in the registered sale deed was required to be accepted.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that deprival of deduction u/s 10AA of the Income Tax Act merely on the reasoning that deduction was claimed in the revised return or audit report in Form 56F was filed during the assessment proceedings is unjustified.
CESTAT Kolkata held that denial of cross examination of witnesses and non-supply of relevant records is clear violation of principle of natural justice and accordingly impugned order is unsustainable.
The existing jurisprudence on the issue at hand can be analyzed from two perspectives (a). dues relating to PF and Gratuity being statutory dues of the first charge and (b). the effect of conjoint reading of Section 36 and Section 53 of IBC.
