Kumar Ram Ranjan Singh Vs State of Bihar (Patna High court) The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious reliefs. The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “Tribunal”) under Section […]
Petitioner submitted that it is correct that for part of GST Refund Claim claim which has been rejected refund was sought after a period of two years
Request for permission to go abroad. HC rejected request only for one reason that application filed by department for cancellation of bail is pending before Court of Sessions.
GST: Petitioner urged that had goods been perishable it ought to have sold in terms of rules 141(2) within 15 days of seizure and as it has not been sold, goods ought to be treated as non-perishable.
Appellants are not the manufacturer of Aluminium scrap and they have only imported the scrap for manufacture of Aluminium ingots.
Since the question of whether the transactions in issue constitute works contracts or sales would involve an examination of the contracts as well as various other factual particulars and such an exercise cannot be undertaken in writ jurisdiction.
Petitioner is neither an employee of HEC, Ltd., nor he is responsible for collection of TDS, on behalf of HEC, from any contractors, employees or others
HC held that orders of assessment suffer from violation of principles of natural justice. Correspondence between parties establishes that petitioner was cooperating with proceedings for assessment.
Delve into Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, exploring its intricacies on tax deduction for commission or brokerage payments. Learn about applicable rates, exemptions, and insights from relevant case laws. Stay informed to ensure accurate compliance.
Income-Tax Implications for the Sellers, if any Immovable Property is Sold for a consideration less than Stamp Duty Value
