Partners of an LLP can learn how to file their income tax return under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act of 1961 with this guide. ITR 5 is the applicable form for filing an LLP income tax return.
DCIT Vs Yazdani International Pvt Ltd (ITAT Cuttack) ITAT Cuttack that expenditure towards various computer software and stationary and the expenditure towards upgradation of software for filing of return before the ROC and website design is revenue in nature and hence allowable. Facts- The revenue has challenged the action of CIT(A) in deleting the addition […]
ITAT Delhi concluded that grants were given specifically for participation in a particular event held in abroad grant was utilized as per terms and conditions and it was not free for the assessee to use the funds voluntarily. Accordingly approval of CBDT under sections 11(1)(c) of the Act not required.
Discover the fundamental differences between NGO and Section 8 companies, and explore both legal structures to better understand the implications for each.
The Author in this article discusses a decision of tribunal (ITAT) regarding taxation of amount paid by companies for broadcasting Cricket World cup matches during FY 2001-02 and 2002-03 held outside India in the hands of a non-resident. The bench has decided that the amount is taxable as royalty in India.
State of Karnataka Vs Hemanth Motors (Karnataka High Court) Learned AGA appearing for the appellant has vehemently argued and contended that unloading was not done until 5.00 p.m. on the next day and therefore, the goods cannot be transported without seeking extension of validity period of E-way bill. The learned AGA would further contend that […]
Shri Keshab Purkayastha Vs Union of India (Tripura High Court) The impugned order dated 16.11.2022 passed by the respondent No.3, apart from being illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction, is apparently perverse and fraught with patent illegality since it was conclusively decided by the respondent No.2 after consulting the relevant laws that the services rendered by […]
Tvl. Ramana Textiles Private Limited Vs Commissioner of State GST and Commercial Taxes (Madras High Court) The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to refund the eligible excess ITC amount for the month of January to March 2018, based on the petitioner’s application dated 13.02.2019 […]
No prejudice was caused to the Assessing Officer on account of non-complying with the notice u/s 142(1) issued on 05.09.2019 and inaction of the Assessing Officer on the adjournment petition moved by the assessee would also enable the appellant to believe that the time to comply with the extension of time as prayed was granted.
Assessee failed to establish difference amount specified in Form 26AS and returns despite several opportunities – ITAT upheld addition
