Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Archive: 22 May 2022

Posts in 22 May 2022

Classification of Import of Dehydrated Dark and Seedless raisin

May 22, 2022 1509 Views 0 comment Print

In re Frizwell Agro Foods (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR held that the dehydrated dark and small seedless raisin (Vitis vinifera) merit classification under subheading 08062010 of the first schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and are eligible for exemption benefit allowed under sr. no. 32 of notification no. 50/2017-Cus., dated 30.06.2017. FULL TEXT OF ORDER […]

ITAT allows Section 54 Exemption on Notional value of Flat to be constructed in future time

May 22, 2022 1530 Views 0 comment Print

ITO Vs Sanika Avadhoot Shilotri (ITAT Mumbai) When the developer failed to provide original flat then it had offered another flat in the building which was to be constructed on a future date. When the assessee has booked the flat that property was not in existing and it was a property to be constructed in […]

HC stays Proceedings based on Notice issued by DRI

May 22, 2022 837 Views 0 comment Print

Vijay Baid @ Vicky Vs Union of India (Chhattisgarh High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that pursuant to arrest made by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) on 01.05.2021 of two persons at Railway Station- Raipur, DRI further searched the house of petitioner on the same date and have seized gold bar, silver […]

Both Signature & Thumb Impression not Mandatory for A Pro-Note Under Negotiable Instruments Act

May 22, 2022 2976 Views 0 comment Print

R.Barathbaran (Died) Vs R. Nallathambi (Madras High Court) There is no mandatory provision under the Negotiable Instruments Act that both the signature and thump impression has to be obtained for a pro-note and the lower Appellate Judge has totally misguided and misused the provision of the Negotiable Instruments Act, regarding burden of proof and not […]

Refund claim not get time barred if filed within time but before wrong forum

May 22, 2022 1524 Views 0 comment Print

Hivelm Industries Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) It is not in dispute that the deemed export did not attract any Excise Duty and hence, it is not the duty of the appellant / taxpayer to repeatedly plead before the authorities that the project in which it was involved was a deemed […]

Reassessment cannot be In Casual & Whimsical Manner

May 22, 2022 753 Views 0 comment Print

Manash Nandi Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) We find that the AO has recorded the reasons u/s 148 of the Act in a very casual manner. We find that the AO has only reproduced in the reasons recorded the information received and hurriedly came to the conclusion that there exists escapement of income and evasion of […]

Arbitrator can decide if Supplementary Agreement Rescinding Arbitration Clause is Contrary To Law: HC

May 22, 2022 1659 Views 0 comment Print

Kiran Infra Engineers Limited Vs Northern Railway (Delhi High Court) The question as to whether the supplementary agreement is a full and final discharge of respective obligations under the principal agreement and also rescinds the terms and conditions of the principal agreement is itself in dispute, which requires to be referred to Arbitral Tribunal. The […]

Writ Jurisdiction cannot be invoked for mere Refusal to delete Name of A Party From Arbitral Proceedings

May 22, 2022 411 Views 0 comment Print

State of Odisha Vs Nayagarh Sugar Complex Ltd (Orissa High Court) The agreement provides for exclusion of representations and There are recitals in connection with or in relation to representations or warranties in mentioning Government of Odisha as substantial share holder in the seller and having had acted through Registrar of Cooperative Societies. Department of […]

RERA: Adjudicating Authority alone can decide Compensation amount

May 22, 2022 7032 Views 0 comment Print

Gold Bricks Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Vs Atit Agrawal (Chhattisgarh High Court) The order of the Appellate Tribunal is for appointment of Architect and make an inspection in respect of development carried out. The order further contains to decide the quantum of infrastructure/ user charges in absence of agreement and thereafter to decide the modus of […]

Commission payment not allowable if not for the purpose of business

May 22, 2022 2124 Views 0 comment Print

Oripol Industries Ltd. Vs JCIT (Orissa High Court) In the present case, all the persons to whom commission was paid were either Directors of the Company or their relatives. None of them is shown to have any expertise in procuring IOF from the Indian markets for enabling the Appellant to meet the purchase order placed […]

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031