Omkar Nath Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi (Delhi High Court) Concededly, the AO passed the impugned assessment order, as indicated above, on 07.06.2021, without granting an opportunity to the petitioner of a personal hearing in the matter. This being the position, clearly, the provisions of Section 144B(7)(vii) of the Act would apply in this […]
Dishman Pharmaceutical & Chemicals Ltd. Vs C.S.T.-Service Tax (CESTAT Ahmedabad) As regard the service tax demand on stock exchange fees, we find that no documentary evidence was produced to show that this is a statutory levy and the appellant have paid as reimbursement. It appears that the Stock Exchange has charged fees to the appellant […]
Financial creditors realise 221% of liquidation value and 51% of admitted claims through corporate insolvency resolution process As per inputs received from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), was initiated by banks in the 12 large accounts that were referred by the […]
More than 3.82 lakh companies struck off till financial year 2020-21 in Special Drives taken by Registrar of Companies Under the Special Drives taken by Registrar of Companies, 3,82,875 number of companies ware struck off u/s 248 (1) of the Companies Act till the financial year 2020-21. This was stated by Union Minister of State for […]
Ingram Micro India Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (Exports)(CESTAT Chennai) It can be seen that the refund claim is rejected on the ground that the appellant has not produced the Chartered Accountant certificate to establish that the burden of 4% Additional Duty has not been passed on to another. In page 21 of the appeal […]
Chakra Special Trading Co. Pvt Ltd Vs C.C. Kandla (CESTAT Ahmedabad) It is settled law that the price of contemporeous goods cannot be applied invariably in each and every case. Before applying the enhanced comparable price varies circumtances need to be verified such as the quality of goods, quantity of goods, country of origin etc. […]
DCIT Vs Ganpat Singhvi (ITAT Mumbai) The undisputed facts are that Respondent is an individual residing in Abu Dhabi, UAE since 1976. The Respondent is a Chartered Accountant, working with Al Nasser Holdings as Group Advisor & Director (formerly as Managing Director). During FY 2005-06 (AY 2006-07), the respondent resided in India for a period […]
ACIT (Intl. Taxation) Vs Baker Hughes Singapore Pte. (ITAT Dehradun) Article VII deals with taxation of business profits and also provides for mechanism to compute the profits of the business. Paragraph no. 4 relieves the source State from the rigors of paragraphs nos. (1) and (2) in case the interest is found to be effectively […]
Nosch Labs Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Hyderabad) Section 113 of the Customs Act provides for confiscation of export goods i.e., goods attempted to be exported. It does not provide for confiscation of goods which have already been exported. The term ‘export goods’ is defined in Section 2(19) of the Customs Act as […]
Guidelines for recovery proceedings under the provisions of section 79 of the HGST Act, 2017 in cases covered under explanation to sub-section (12) of section 75 of the HGST Act, 2017
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
