Case Law Details
Case Name : DCIT Vs Ganpat Singhvi (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
DCIT Vs Ganpat Singhvi (ITAT Mumbai)
The undisputed facts are that Respondent is an individual residing in Abu Dhabi, UAE since 1976. The Respondent is a Chartered Accountant, working with Al Nasser Holdings as Group Advisor & Director (formerly as Managing Director). During FY 2005-06 (AY 2006-07), the respondent resided in India for a period of 45 days which does not exceed the maximum threshold limit specified in Section 6 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) and accordingly, the respondent was non-resident for AY 2006-07. Details of stay
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.