Key Highlights: ✓ Extension of scope of supply ✓ Legal validity of Rule 36(4) ✓ Removal of GST Audit ✓ Int on net tax liability from 01st July 2017 ✓ Customs Updates CHANGES IN GST 1. Retrospective amendment to include activities by an association to its members (Clause 99 and 113 of Finance Bill, 2021) […]
Lam Research (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) It was submitted that Working capital adjustment is made for the time value of money lost when credit time is given to the customers. The Assessee however does not bear any risk and has no working capital contingencies. The Assessee has not incurred any expenses for […]
High Court held that even if the assessee is engaged in the category of activity of ‘object of general public utility’, they are entitled for registration under Section 12A. Therefore, we are of the considered view that the assessee can claim registration under Section 12A by categorising the activity of the assessee as ‘object of general public utility’.
Do you wish to sell goods to the Government ? If yes, then you can do so by registering on GEM Portal which is a E-marketplace for selling goods to the government through Online bidding. To know more about this, read the complete article. Introduction E market place set up for procurement and selling of […]
Asian Paints Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) We have considered rival submissions in the light of decisions relied upon and perused material on record. Undisputedly, the assessee in its computation of income has computed disallowance under section 14A of the Act at Rs.23,98,769 by applying certain principles of apportionment. Therefore, it is not a case […]
Mukul Mittal Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (Delhi High Court) The petitioner has been in custody now for 56 days. The maximum sentence provided for the offence alleged against the petitioner is imprisonment for a period of five years, therefore the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate is required to take congnizance on the complaint is […]
Circular No. 03/2021-Customs F.No. DGEP/EOU/40/2017 Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (Directorate General of Export Promotion) ****** New Delhi, dated 03rd February, 2021 To, All Pr. Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Customs/ Customs (Prev.) All Pr. Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Central Tax/ Central Excise […]
Absence of proof of demand for illegal gratification and mere possession or recovery of currency notes is not sufficient to constitute such offence. In the said judgments it is also held that even the presumption under Section 20 of the Act can be drawn only after demand for and acceptance of illegal gratification is proved.
In the present case, the petitioner has, admittedly, remitted amounts of Rs.66.05 and Rs.16.58 lakhs as deposits even prior to the issuance of show cause notice. However, the petitioner has specifically demarcated the amount of Rs.66.05 lakhs as towards tax and Rs.16.58 lakhs as towards interest.
In order to make available Vector Borne Disease specific health insurance product addressing the needs of insuring public for getting health insurance coverage to specified Vector Borne Diseases, the Authority encourages all general and health insurers to offer Standard Vector Borne Disease Health Policy (Hereafter referred as standard product).
