The IBC Code has been hailed as one of the most important economic legislation in recent times, having reformed the much-needed exit mechanism for corporates, to start with, and having addressed an important aspect of ease of doing business in the country.
To summarise, while the Code is purely a legislation that codifies the run of the rule of law governing insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings in relation to companies (insolvency of individuals is yet to be brought under the ambit of this law), its sheer operation in the ecosystem has led to various consequences on behaviour of parties involved and persons affected by it.
One of the most significant changes observed on implementation of the Code is the behavioural change in the stakeholders involved in the resolution process.
Tariff Notification No. 75/2019-Customs (N.T.) in respect of Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Poppy Seeds, Areca Nut, Gold and Silver- Reg Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) (Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs) Notification No. 75/2019-CUSTOMS (N.T.) New Delhi, 15th October, 2019 23 Asvina, 1941 (SAKA) S.O. […]
SEBI Guidelines on Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Standards and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT)/Obligations of Securities Market Intermediaries under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and Rules framed there under
The learned CIT(A) noticed that the assessee has not filed detail of expenses before the Assessing Officer, still he restricted the disallowance for other expenses to 10% of the total expenses without any justification and only on the basis of the magnitude of the disallowance. The learned CIT(A) should have examined the books of accounts along with bills and vouchers to decide the issue of disallowance of other expenses and depreciation.
Seeks to impose anti-dumping duty on imports of Flat rolled product of steel, plated or coated with alloy of Aluminium and Zinc originating in, or exported from China PR, Vietnam and Korea RP. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) NOTIFICATION No. 40/2019-CUSTOMS (ADD) New Delhi, the 15th October, 2019 G.S.R. 786(E). – […]
Authority is of the view that further period of four months be given to the Institute to complete its entire proceedings on priority. The Institute is, however, burdened with penalty of Rs.50,000/- in each appeal payable to the Appellate Authority within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
CESTAT Delhi has held that mere cabling of various parts of agricultural machine (laser level transmitter, laser receivers, control boxes connecting cables and rechargeable battery packs) so as to let them function as a complete machine does not amount to manufacture and hence benefit of Sl. No. 399(A) of Not No. 12/2012-Cus. cannot be denied.
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Admittedly there has been a typographical/ clerical error on the part of the petitioner which the petitioner is entitled to correct while filling up the TRAN-I Form, we dispose of this writ petition by directing the Respondents “to either open […]
