Madhur Shares & Stock Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahemdabad) -
Where total debt debited in the account of the client is inclusive of brokerage then brokerage being part of the total debt having been taken into account in computing the income, would satisfy the provisions of sec. 36(2) and therefore, when assessee writes off such debt then he would be entitled for deduction u/s. 36(1)(vii)....
Rajhans Builders Vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahemdabad) -
If books of account are found to be correct and complete in all respect and no defect is pointed out therein and cost of construction of building is recorded therein, then the addition on account of difference in cost of construction cannot be made even if a report is obtained within the meaning of section 142A from the DVO....
Nitin S. Garg Vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahemdabad) -
Merely because the liabilities are outstanding for last many years, it cannot be inferred that the said liabilities have ceased to exist. It is also a fact that the assessee has not written off the outstanding liabilities in the books of account and the outstanding liabilities are still in existence would prove that the assessee acknowled...
Shyourajsingh B Chauhan Vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahemdabad) -
When any fact material to the determination of an item as income or material to the correct computation is not filed or that which is filed is not accurate, then the assessee would be liable to penalty under section 271(1)(c)....
ITO Vs. Patwa Kinariwala Electronics Ltd. (ITAT Ahemdabad) -
Once there is no patent or any intellectual right vested in a person over a thing, no claim of royalty can be allowed to him....
ACIT Vs. Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd. (ITAT Cochin) -
The agreement of the assessee to acquire a rented property for running its office cannot be considered as an intangible asset similar to know how, patents, copy rights, trade marks, etc under section 32(1)(ii)....
CIT Vs. Popular Vehicles & Services Ltd. (Kerala High Court) -
Scope of Explanation 2 to Section 147 is such that Assessing Officer is free to re-examine correctness of a regular assessment and decide whether tax assessed, rate applied, relief and allowances granted, etc., are in terms of provisions of Act and if not, to revise assessment in terms of Section 147. Section 147, after amendment, is larg...
Dinesh T. Tailor Vs. TRO (Bombay High Court) -
Where Parliament has intended to make a specific provision imposing a liability to pay penalty apart from the tax which is due and payable, a specific provision to that effect has been made; the expression "tax due" in section 179(1) cannot comprehend within the meaning of that expression a liability to pay a penalty that may have been im...
Gopal Das Khandelwal Vs. Union of India (Allahabad High Court) -
A search and seizure under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as an Act) was conducted on 9.5.2003 and 24.5.2003 on the business and the residential premises of respondent no. 5 Purshottam Das Khandelwal who happened to be the proprietor of the firm M/S Suraj Bhan Purshottam Das engaged in money lending busin...
CIT Vs. Manappuram General Finance & Leasing Ltd. (Kerala High Court) -
If the financiers have only financed or purchased the vehicle and the borrowers are the registered owners, then the financiers are not entitled to claim any depreciation because they are neither the owners of the vehicle nor have they used the vehicle in their profession or business entitling them for depreciation under section 32(1)...