Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!
Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!
Notification No. 73/2009 – Income Tax Section 118 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Control of income-tax authorities – Notified subordinate officers In exercise of the powers conferred by section 118 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby directs that the Income-tax authorities specified in column (3) of the Schedule below shall be subordinate to the Income tax authority specified in column (2) of the said Schedule.
Indian CA firms having affiliation with international entities/network – (22-06-2009)ANNOUNCEMENT (For Mandatory compliance) Indian CA firms having affiliation with international entities/network All the CA firms registered with the ICAI having affiliation with international entities/network are requested to furnish the following documents/details to the High Powered Committee of the ICAI: (1) Agreement/contract with the multinational entity; (2) […]
Income tax sleuths on Friday detected tax evasion worth around Rs 14 crore from five developers-cum- real estate agents of Mohali. This is considered to be the biggest detection made by the department during the current financial year. I-T men expect the figure to go up further after scrutiny of account books and computers impounded during […]
In a circular dated May 21, 2009, CBDT, said, The credit for any TDS…claim will be allowed…if the assessee quotes the relevant UTN for every TDS. Simply put, if a UTN is not mentioned against a TDS transaction then the tax already paid by the individual will be considered unpaid.
This follows a recommendation from the income tax department that TDS rates should be structured in three slabs of between one and five per cent for any stream of income. TDS is the final tax payable by an assessee receiving any income as salary, contract fee or dues. It is deducted by the taxpayer while […]
The country’s largest insurer Life Insurance Corporation, has decided to operationalise a system within two years that will allow policy holders to claim benefits and pay premium at any of its over 2,100 branches. “Premium payment can be done from anywhere in India. That’s what we have done it. Now claim payment we would like […]
For the purposes of this notification, rate of exchange applicable for the purposes of calculation of such anti-dumping duty shall be the rate which is specified in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), issued from time to time, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the Customs Act 1962 (52 of 1962), and the relevant date for the determination of the rate of exchange shall be the date of presentation of the bill of entry under section 46 of the said Customs Act.
For the purposes of this notification, rate of exchange applicable for the purposes of calculation of anti-dumping duty shall be the rate which is specified in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), issued from time to time, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and the relevant date for determination of the rate of exchange shall be the date of presentation of the bill of entry under section 46 of the said Customs Act.
5. The assessee was subjected to search assessment, whereupon additions were made, which included disallowance of interest expenditure Rs.54,1800/- ; addition for unexplained cash credit Rs.10,500/-, and another disallowance of claim of set off of business loss Rs.18,698/-; totalling Rs.83,378/-. The assessee contended before the AO that the disallowance of interest expenditure on bank loan was only a technical addition
18. One cannot fail to notice that both the proviso to sub section 1 of section 11A and section 11AC use the same expressions: “….by reasons of fraud, collusion or any wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts, or contravention of any of the provisions of this Act or of the rules made thereunder with intent to evade payment of duty,…”. In other words the conditions that would extend the normal period of one year to five years
