In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.39/2006-NT-Customs, dated the 28th March, 2006 [S.O.423(E), dated the 28th March, 2006.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 14 of Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.38/2006-NT-Customs, dated the 28th March, 2006.
The principal rules were published vide notification No. 23/2004-Central Excise (N.T.), dated the 10th September, 2004, G.S.R.600 (E), dated the 10th September, 2004 and was last amended vide notification No. 9/2006-Central Excise (N.T.), dated the 21st April, 2006, G.S.R. 240(E), dated the 21st April, 2006.
In the statement of Standard Input Output Norms as contained in the Handbook of Procedures, (Vol.2) 2004-2009, as amended, amendments/ deletions/ corrections/ additions at appropriate places as mentioned in Annexure “A” to this Public Notice are made.
The principal notification No. 26/2001-Central Excise, dated the 11th May, 2001 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 347 (E), dated the 11th May, 2001 and was last amended vide notification number 20/2006-Central Excise, dated the 1st March, 2006, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 110 (E), dated the1stMarch,2006.
Explore a landmark Income Tax Appellate Tribunal case from Chennai where a penalty under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act was successfully deleted. The tribunal found that the undisclosed income, as declared in the block return, remained the assessed income. Discover the rationale behind the tribunal’s decision, emphasizing the genuine nature of credits, the agricultural background of creditors, and the firm’s non-professional management. Learn how the tribunal concluded that the acceptance of cash loans was due to business exigencies, establishing a reasonable cause for the exemption from penalties. #IncomeTax #LegalCase #ChennaiTribunal
Amendment in the notification No. 1/2006-Service Tax, dated the 1st March, 2006 reg. transport of goods in containers by rail Date: 25th April, 2006 Notification No. 20/2006-Service Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government, on being satisfied that […]
Amends 13/2004-Service Tax, dated the 10th September, 2004 ,14/2004-Service Tax, dated the 10th September, 2004 ,29/2004-Service Tax, dated the 22nd September, 2004 ,16/2005-Service Tax, dated the 7th June, 2005 and 21/2005-Service Tax, dated the 7th June, 2005 Date: 25th April, 2006 Notification No. 19/2006-Service Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of […]
Amend the Service Tax (Registration of Special Category of Persons) Rules, 2005 Date: 25th April, 2006 Notification No. 18/2006-Service Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Service […]
Amend the Service Tax Rules, 1994 Date: 25th April, 2006 Notification No. 17/2006-Service Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Service Tax Rules, 1994, namely :– 1. […]
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
