Revision under Section 55 of Uttarakhand VAT Act to assail order dated 22.04.2013, with application to seek condonation of delay of 3502 days
Delhi High Court sets aside a tax notice against Majestic Handicraft Private Limited, challenging the claim of accommodation entries.
Addition u/s 43B on account of External Development Charges (EDC) not paid to HUDA before due date of filing return of income not justified
It is well settled that each day of delay in filing has to be explained. In present case, there are large gaps in time period for which no ostensible reason been provided.
As the turnover of the assessee was less than the prescribed limit fixed for tax audit, provisions of Section 44AB of the Act are not applicable to the assessee. When the provisions of Section 44 AB of the Act are not applicable to the facts of the case, levy of penalty under Section 271B of the Act does not arise.
Share application money is not loan or deposit and hence not falls u/s 269SS of the Act and penalty u/s 271D cannot be levied.
Delhi High Court remands BSNL’s GST refund case to Adjudicating Authority, highlighting the importance of proper document submission under CGST Act.
Hair Transplant is neither undertaken to restore or reconstruct anatomy or its functions, nor the procedure of hair transplant restores developmental abnormalities degenerative diseases, injury or trauma. We find that hair transplant is a medical procedure to improve outer look of the body for time being and it does in any way contributes to the anatomy or functions of human body.
ITAT Hyderabad’s decision exempts Ochre Media Pvt. Ltd. from late filing fees under Section 234E for TDS returns, citing procedural amendments.
ITAT Delhi held that if in the initial year of claim the depreciation, is allowed, the claim cannot be disturbed in the subsequent years.
