ITAT Ahmedabad held that deprival of deduction u/s 10AA of the Income Tax Act merely on the reasoning that deduction was claimed in the revised return or audit report in Form 56F was filed during the assessment proceedings is unjustified.
CESTAT Kolkata held that denial of cross examination of witnesses and non-supply of relevant records is clear violation of principle of natural justice and accordingly impugned order is unsustainable.
Kerala High Court held that deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act is allowable only if the same is claimed via a valid return.
ITAT Delhi held that imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on a highly debatable issue is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that depreciation on goodwill cannot be rejected merely because performance didn’t match projections. Notably, valuation of goodwill on discounted cash flow method was duly accepted by AO.
PCIT Vs Narayan Kumar Khaitan (Orissa High Court) Case Law on Service of notice required through Superintendent of Jail if assessee is in judicial custody. A search and seizure operation under section 132 was conducted on SM and group wherein certain incriminating documents were found. Subsequently, assessment in case of assessee was completed under section […]
The Calcutta high court in this case was dealing with challenge to declaration of the petitioner herein as a wilful defaulter vide order passed in October,2018 when the counsel for the bank challenged maintainability on the ground of delay. The bank argued that the immediate cause of the writ was the lookout circular which was issued against the petitioner whereupon the petitioner was not allowed to travel abroad.
S. Ramamirtham Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) It is an admitted fact that the original assessment has been completed u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 20.03.2014. It is also an admitted fact that notice u/s. 148 of the Act dated 13.09.2017 is beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Thus, proviso to […]
Ashok Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT observed that the assessee has replaced old bulbs/tube lights with new LED lights. Some other expenditure was incurred for regular repair and replacement. Thus, from the nature of expenditure incurred, it is evident that they are in the nature of consumables and not for acquiring any assets […]
Letter written by Central Excise Superintendent is a decision against which appeal lies before Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 35
