Explore the landmark ruling by ITAT Pune on deductions for interest income from deposits with a nationalized bank, as illustrated in the Subordinate Engineers Association MSEB Co.op. Credit Society Ltd Vs ITO case.
ITAT Delhi held that as the original return was only processed u/s 143(1), AO can duly initiate re-opening of proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act so as to bring the escaped income into tax.
Delhi High Court held that, in respect of gold jewellery, which was exported for exhibitions and re-imported into the country, the procedure of filing of a B/E, under Section 46 of the Customs Act, was inapplicable.
NCLAT Delhi held that role of company as well as the appellant in providing inputs for arriving at rigged pricing is somehow or the other proved. Accordingly, imposition of penalty by the Commission cannot be faulted.
NCLT is not conferred with power of review, it inherently possesses the power to recall a judgment on sufficient grounds under Rule 11 of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016
In Sharon Agarwal Vs ITO, ITAT Delhi deletes addition of cash gifts received from mother. Explore implications of this landmark decision
ITAT Mumbai held that it is settled legal position that when income is estimated, then there can be no question of imposing penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.
ITAT Delhi held that assessment order based on notice issued under section 148 not by the jurisdictional AO is unsustainable and liable to be quashed.
Delhi High Court held that disqualification of Haj Group Organization merely on the basis of uncertainty in respect of the amount of GST to be paid is unjust.
NCLAT Delhi held that held that the Lenders and Banks are obliged to discharge their obligations as per the Resolution Plan and Resolution Applicant must also perform its obligation as per the Resolution Plan.
