ITAT Kolkata held that amount meant to be transferred to reserve fund, as per section 45-IC of the RBI Act, very well falls in the definition of income of the assessee and accordingly, such amount is to be included for the purpose of computation of income under the Income Tax Act.
NCLAT Delhi held that an appeal under the Companies Act, 2013 would be available to a ‘person’ who is either a ‘Member’ of the Company or a ‘Creditor’ or a ‘Director’. Since, appellant is none of these, appeal before NCLT is not maintainable.
On appeal, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee could deviate from the earlier selected Most Appropriate Method if the new method was more in line with the applicable provisions.
The case of ITO vs Saloni Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. revolves around the failure to file income tax returns in due time, an offence under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act. The directors of the company were sentenced to six months of rigorous imprisonment due to the late filing of their income returns for AY 2014-2015.
Delhi High Court orders reevaluation in Upinder Kumar Wanchoo vs ITO, stressing fair hearing and document review under Sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT directs re-adjudication of penalty imposed under section 270A of the IT Act for misreporting of income without the application of mind.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition on account of deemed dividend as per section 2(22)(e) of the Act unsustainable in the hands of non-shareholders.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition towards bogus purchases unsustainable if the alleged bogus purchases show gross profit higher than the regular gross profit.
ITAT Surat held that deduction under section 54B duly allowable in case the nature of land was converted from agriculture to non-agriculture purpose just before transfer of land.
ITAT Mumbai held that that the joint ownership of the property would not stand in the way of claiming exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act.
