CESTAT Chennai held that collection of CVD on basis of retail sale price in terms of Notification No. 49/2008-C.E.(N.T.) dated 24.12.2008 issued under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in case of prepared glues and other prepared adhesives justified.
ITAT Mumbai held that the provisions of Sec. 56(2)(x) of the Act are incorporated in the Finance Act 2017 with the prospective applicability from A.Y.2017-18 and the transactions entered into prior to 1.04.2017 would not suffer any implications of the section.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that post amendment to section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, as introduced vide Finance (No.2) Act, disallowance on account of non-deduction of TDS is restriction to 30% of the expenditure as against 100%.
CESTAT Kolkata held that the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in subsequent show cause notice, where the Department has earlier issued Show Cause Notice in respect of the same subject-matter.
An overview of the ITAT Mumbai ruling in Hitesh Shantilal Mehta Vs DCIT, where the Tribunal deleted an addition by disallowance of interest expenses accrued from investments in shares and securities
Delhi High Court’s ruling on Classic Decorators’ appeal for a pre-deposit waiver against a limitation-barred service tax demand order
In the case of Rakhi Gautam Vs ITO (ITAT Indore), the ITAT has ordered re-adjudication due to a lack of proper hearing. Notices were sent to the registered email ID instead of physical form.
Examine the recent NCLAT Delhi verdict in the UTI Employees Sai Samruddhi Cooperative Housing Society Vs PNB Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors. case, emphasizing the significance of allowing objections in resolution plans.
ITAT Chennai ruling on consequential and mandatory nature of interest under sections 234A to 234D in case of Iljin Automotive Pvt Ltd vs DCIT
ITAT Chennai in Bank of India vs ACIT case decides on applicability of TDS late fees under section 234E before June 2015,
