Delve into the notable decision of ITAT Chandigarh in the case of Mahaluxmi Food Industries Vs ITO, concerning the right to set off losses against surrendered business income as per Section 115BBE(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
ITAT held that dividend declared, distributed or paid by a domestic company to non resident shareholder (s) attract additional income tax (tax on distributed profits) referred to in section 115-O of the Act, such additional income tax payable by the domestic company shall be at the rate of mentioned in section 115-O of the Act and not at the rate of tax applicable to the non resident shareholder(s) as specified in the relevant DTAA with reference to such dividend income.
A comprehensive review of the recent ITAT Delhi’s ruling on Span Air Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT case, which offers key insights on depreciation claims under section 32 of the Income Tax Act.
Madras High Court rules on Seoyon E-Hwa Summit Automotive India’s case, justifying rejection of rectification application under CGST Act due to assessee’s lack of cooperation during assessment process.
Allahabad High Court in Mohini Traders v. State of U.P., held that assessing authority must provide an opportunity for a personal hearing before passing an adverse order, regardless of whether assessee explicitly requested it
Judgment by Bombay High Court in C.P. Rabindranath Menon v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, which allows unregistered persons to claim GST refunds for the period before issuance of a refund policy.
Learn about the pivotal judgement in the BT Data & Surveying Services India Pvt Ltd Vs ITO case, where ITAT Delhi upholds disallowance for belated employees’ contributions to PF/ESIC.
Understand the recent ruling by ITAT Delhi in the case of Savleen Kaur Vs ITO, affirming that a delayed deposit of Employees Contribution to ESI/PF can be disallowed by CPC in Section 143(1) proceedings.
Learn about the latest judgement from ITAT Delhi, where it upheld the disallowance of belated employee contributions to EPF/ESIC in section 143(1) income tax proceedings.
ITAT Mumbai held that the TPO is not correct in arriving at the ALP as NIL on the ground that the need and benefit test is not satisfied by the assessee without giving any contrary findings with regard to the various documents including the TP study submitted by the assessee.
