Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : BT Data and Surveying Services India Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No.1658/Del/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/02/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

BT Data and Surveying Services India Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi has made an important ruling in the case of BT Data and Surveying Services India Pvt Ltd Vs ITO. The judgement centres around the disallowance of belated employee contributions to Provident Fund (PF) and Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) under sections 36(i)(va) and 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: Despite several opportunities granted for compliance, the assessee failed to appear, leading the ITAT Delhi to proceed ex-parte. The Revenue department argued that the Central Processing Centre (CPC) added Rs.3,13,070/- to the assessee’s returned income due to the late deposit of employee contributions to Provident Fund/ESIC. The department’s actions were backed by a judgement in the case of Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. vs CIT, which solidified the notion that belated employee contributions are to be considered as taxable income under section 2(24)(x) of the Act, making them ineligible for deduction under section 36(i)(va) in the case of delayed payments.

The verdict also aligned with the perspective of the Pune Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Cemetile Industries vs ITO, asserting that a delay in depositing employee contributions indicated in the Audit Report is sufficient for adjustment under section 143(1) of the Act. This judgement reiterates the point established by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. vs CIT case and echoes the stance taken by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in Savleen Kaur & Others vs ITO case.

Conclusion: The ruling of the ITAT Delhi in the BT Data and Surveying Services India Pvt Ltd Vs ITO case sets an influential precedent for future cases. The decision reaffirms that delayed employee contributions to Provident Fund/ESIC are to be considered as taxable income, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance. This ruling contributes to the body of jurisprudence surrounding tax liability and compliance, demonstrating the potential consequences for delayed contributions.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031