Read the full text of the judgment/order by the Competition Commission of India in the case of Ravinder Singh vs Dr. Janaki Jangpangi. The judgment analyzes the allegations of bid rejection and determines that it does not amount to abuse under Section 4 of the CCI Act.
Imagine the excitement of buying your dream home, eagerly waiting for its completion and possession, only to face delay after delay, broken promises, and endless frustrations. In such cases, consumers may file a complaint seeking relief from the concerned authorities.
In-depth analysis of the ITAT Delhi case, Nitin Kumar Vs ITO, determining that interest received on enhanced compensation under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is not taxable.
HC held that amount collected without authority of law at the time of search should be refunded along with the interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filling this petition, within 30 days after the receipt of certified copy of order.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that notice issued under section 263 of the Income Tax Act in the name of a deceased person is invalid. Accordingly, order passed thereon is also invalide in the eyes of law.
Delhi High Court has set aside the assessment order issued against Dauphin Travel Marketing Private Limited. The main bone of contention was the inadequate response time given to the company to answer a show-cause notice, resulting in a breach of the principles of natural justice.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that no penalty can be imposed u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act on account of disallowance of expenses incurred for increase of authorized share capital since no penalty can be imposed when there was no willful concealment.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition in case of bogus purchases are restricted only to the extent of profit element involved on such purchases. Accordingly, CIT(A) correctly restricted addition to the extent of 10%.
The provisions of section 44AD/44AF of the Act apply only to presumptive assessment, where the turnover is Rs.40.00 lacs or less and not the cases, where turnover is more than that.
A deep dive into the significant ruling of ITAT Mumbai in ITO Vs Asahi Infrastructure Projects Ltd case, exploring the issues related to the reopening of the assessment and non-genuine purchases, as per the guidelines set in the landmark GKN Driveshaft case.
