Explore the case Dariyav Singh Vs ITO. Understand why the Assessing Officer was deemed unfit to rectify the Principal CIT’s mistake in form 5 under VSVS Scheme.
Read about the recent Madras High Court ruling that denies Input Tax Credit (ITC) if tax hasn’t been paid to the government. Analysis and implications for businesses dealing with suppliers with cancelled GST registrations.
In present facts of the case, it was held that the services rendered were in the nature of advisory services as per the terms of the agreement, therefore these services cannot be the part of Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 13 of India – UK DTAA.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal while deducting the additions made by Ld. AO for repair and maintenance, it was observed that if the replacement is of a baby part only, then the same cannot be considered to be a capital expenditure.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court granted refund to the petitioner along with Interest from year 1988 for the cash which was seized without any corroboration and the said cash was also duly reflected in Income Tax Returns.
In the case of Raj Inter Decor Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, CESTAT Chandigarh ruled that service tax cannot be levied for a composite contract under the wrong head.
Delhi High Court supports Valley Iron & Steel Co.’s voluntary enhancement of disallowance under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act. Detailed analysis and implications here.
Delhi High Court rules in favour of a woman denied Section 54 tax exemption without hearing. Court mandates fairness and compliance with law.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules no service tax leviable on VAT-subjected vehicle sales, in Jivan Jyot Motors Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST.
Calcutta High Court sets aside an assessment order after the death of the noticee prior to the initiation of proceedings under Section 148A(b) of IT Act.
