The respondent/importer had filed three bills of entry dated 27.01.2021 for clearance of imported goods Zinc Scrap, Saves/Scope which were imported from M/s Olympic Metal, Miami, USA. As the Department noticed that the declared value of the goods was lower than the contemporaneous import of similar goods and that the sale involved an abnormal discount and abnormal rejection from ordinary competitive prices, a query was raised from the importer to provide material/evidence to justify the declared value in terms of Section 17(3) of the Customs Act, 1962
Read the full text of ITAT Ahmedabad’s order deleting the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Dineshkumar Kanjibhai Patel-HUF as no concealment of particulars or inaccurate income filing found.
CESTAT Chennai held that Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company paying Commission to unapproved dealers in the guise of receipt of ‘data processing and policy servicing and related activities’ service. Accordingly, since such service is not received by the company they are ineligible to avail CENVAT Credit of the same.
Delhi High Court rejected the bail application of Sh. Manish Sisodia as twin conditions as provided under Section 45 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) not satisfied.
ITAT Kolkata held that expenditure incurred towards interior decoration work of a rented office premises is allowable as revenue expenditure. Accordingly, disallowance of such expenditure unjustified.
Madras High Court directed the Ministry of Finance, Government of India and CBDT to consider exempting primary agricultural cooperative credit societies from the purview of the provisions of Section 194N of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
ITAT Chennai held that in the present case AO himself referred the matter for special audit u/s 142(2A), however, report of special auditor was later rejected without assigning any reasons for the same is in explicable.
ITAT Jaipur held that addition towards short term capital loss treating it as bogus unsustainable as transaction of purchase and sale of shares done through banking channel and STT duly paid thereon.
Patna High Court held that as the transaction is purely an inter-state sale of goods and is not a works contract nor a sale of goods exigible to tax within the State of Bihar, the illegal VAT deduction made by the Railways from the bills of the contractors needs to be refunded back.
SAP Medicals Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO: Appeal against ITAT’s 263 ruling. Explore demonetization cash deposit issue, legal analysis, and dismissal grounds.
