In present facts of the case, it was held that the power of National Commission to review under section 21 of the Act is limited to cases where some prima facie error appears in the impugned order and where two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence must be accepted and such findings cannot be substituted in revisional jurisdiction.
In present facts of the case, it was held that the Consumer was entitled to get his claim covered under the sub clause of the Insurance Policy which provides him a higher benefit.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that imposition of penalty unjustified as tax paid along with interest before issuance of show cause notice.
The appellant at the outset submits that with effect from 01.06.2007, the new service namely Works Contract Service was made effective , classification of aforesaid service would undergone a change in case of long term contracts even though part of the service was classified under respective taxable service prior to 01.06.2007
Delhi High Court quashes Section 148A(b) notice due to missing officer details in LSR Medical Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT case. Learn about the legal analysis and implications
HC set aside demand raised on ground that assessee instead of passing ITC through Form GST ITC-02 transferred ITC through Form GSTR-3B and held that the stand of Revenue Department was not correct since Form ITC-02 was not live on common portal.
Explore the Avantha Holdings vs. CG Power case as Delhi High Court evaluates the arbitrability of disputes involving fraud allegations and an existing arbitration agreement.
Explore the recent ITAT Dehradun judgment in Uttarakhand Poorv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. vs. ITO case, challenging AO’s premature jurisdiction assumption under section 148
ITAT Delhi restored the issue to the file of AO with the direction to find out from the relevant PF authorities and ESI authorities about the term ‘every month’ as mentioned in clause 38 of the employees provident fund scheme.
CESTAT Chennai held notebook computers imported for sale to Rajiv Ghandhi University of Knowledge Technologies, Hyderabad (RGUKT) i.e. institutional consumer and not ultimate consumer is assessable under section 4 based on transaction value and not based on Retail Sale Place.
