In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court while restoring the award of Arbitral Tribunal observed that it is well-settled that courts ought not to interfere with the arbitral award in a casual and cavalier manner.
ITAT Chennai held that as capital profit are to be excluded while computing book profit u/s 115JB, similarly, the adjustment of loss could also not be allowed u/s 115JB. Hence, loss on sale of investment could not be reduced from Book Profits u/s 115JB of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Indore held that the penalty levied u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act without any assessment proceedings in the case of the assessee is not valid and liable to be quashed.
Noorul Hasan Baig Vs DCIT/ACIT case at ITAT Indore, exploring necessity of remand for an assessee’s second chance to present relevant documents.
ITAT Chandigarh’s ruling on assessment of surrendered income under section 69 of Income Tax Act. Jaspreet Singh Mauj’s case offers insights into legitimacy of such assessments.
Dive into the ITAT Chandigarh’s ruling in case of Manjeet Singh vs. ITO, which deliberates on validation of unexplained cash deposits.
ITAT Delhi ruling on ACIT vs. Liberty Shoes Ltd. case. Expenditure to avoid reputation damage and litigation costs allowed as valid business expense under Section 37 of Income Tax Act.
Read a detailed analysis of case of Apeejay Shipping Ltd. vs ACIT in ITAT Kolkata regarding jurisdiction of CIT (A) to raise new tax issues and enhance taxable income.
Madras High Court held that CTH 2008 19 20 specifically covers roasted areca nut / betel nut, accordingly, when there is a specific entry covering a product/commodity, the test of common parlance is irrelevant in determining classification.
Bombay High Court held that the transaction of payment of royalty for use of technology is inextricably linked with manufacturing activity and should be aggregated with other international transactions in the manufacturing segment for the purposes of benchmarking the same
