ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of staff welfare expenditure on the adhoc basis unsustainable as AO failed to establish as to who the expenses are not incurred for business purpose.
ITAT Delhi held addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustained as assessee duly satisfied the initial onus i.e. identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction established.
Analysis of Jharkhand HC’s stance on TDS deposits, penalties, and implications on criminal proceedings when deposits are made with interest.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that it is settled legal position that sub-contractor is liable to pay service tax even though main contractor has paid service tax on total value. Accordingly, service tax demand sustained.
ITAT Chennai held that the incidence of tax for joint development agreement (JDA) is different and incidence of tax for subsequent sale of flats is different.
Explore the key details and implications of ITAT Ahmedabad’s ruling on the Shanti Multilink Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT case concerning the validity of an assessment order under section 263.
Analysis of Pawan Aggarwal’s appeal against CIT(A) Ludhiana order regarding disallowance of expenses and building improvement costs. Outcome by ITAT Chandigarh.
Analysis of Bombay HC ruling in Naroli Resorts vs ACIT on reopening tax assessment after four years. Did the assessee disclose all material facts?
Competition Commission of India investigates Jaypee Greens Kalypso Court for alleged profiteering and non-compliance with the CGST Act. Detailed report inside.
Analysis of case between Sparsh Chowdhary and Pearlite Real Properties regarding anti-profiteering under CGST Act, 2017 for Godrej Elements project.