Delhi High Court rules in Boks Business Services Pvt Ltd Vs CGST on determining ‘intermediary’ under the IGST Act. Understand the principal service provider role.
ITAT Chennai restores the matter of Salma Ahmed’s capital gain deduction under section 54F to CIT(E) due to inadequate details provision by the assessee.
CESTAT Chennai supports Fourrts India Laboratories, ruling that physician samples fall under Section 4 (1) (a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Dive into the details of this landmark decision.
Swar Maya Infotech’s treatment of rental and facility management income is evaluated by ITAT Delhi, emphasizing on consistency and accurate deduction claims.
Analysis of the ITAT Delhi verdict: Why the absence of cross-verification under Section 133(6) shouldn’t be the sole reason to disallow business expenses.
Detailed analysis of Beach Minerals Company’s appeal against Commissioner of GST & Central Excise ruling. CESTAT Chennai orders fresh adjudication.
The ITAT Delhi ruling on Seaview Developers regarding deduction claims under section 80IAB for sales of food and beverages and interest expenses.
Analysis of the ITAT Chennai’s ruling in Micky Fireworks Vs ACIT, focusing on the debate around unexplained cash under Section 68 during the demonetization period.
ITAT Chennai rules in favor of Mookambika Impex, stating that excess stock is due to regular business activities. Dive into the detailed analysis.
ITAT referred to SC’s judgment in CIT v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation, Poona, which stated that an entity could claim both depreciation and application of income on asset in its purchase year.
