Product JAC OLIVOL BODY OIL Intended to be Manufactured & Sold by Applicant Would be Covered Under Heading 3304 of First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act and Would be Taxed Accordingly Under GST Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that the interest income earned by a cooperative society on its investments held with a cooperative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec.80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
AAR held that despite providing ample hearing opportunities, applicant shows no interest in seeking an advance ruling through their application in FORM GST ARA-01. Additionally, due to the absence of essential records necessary for addressing the raised concerns, the authority is unable to provide an advance ruling on the matter at hand.
ITAT Mumbai held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on information received by AO from DDIT (investigation) justified subject to fulfilment of conditions as envisaged u/s 147/148.
In re Norbe Pharmacy LLP (GST AAR West Bengal) In re Norbe Pharmacy LLP casee Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR), West Bengal, clarified its inability to provide a ruling on specific issues pertaining to delays in filing ITC-01 and availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) on closing stock. The applicant, Norbe Pharmacy LLP, was registered under […]
Interest for delayed payment of consideration against supply of services will be included in value of supply in terms of clause (d) section 15(2) of CGST Act 2017.
Explore if GST exemption applies to pre and post-exam services like printing admit cards, managing web apps for online exams, and result processing. Learn how a recent GST AAR West Bengal case clarifies tax exemptions for educational services.
In re Aryan Flour Mills Private Limited (AAR West Bengal) What is the value of supply of services provided by the applicant for conversion of wheat provided by the State Government into atta/ fortified atta, for distribution by the State Government through Public Distribution System and what is the rate of tax applicable on such […]
HC set aside SCN and held that assessee was not ‘intermediary’ and therefore, refund claim of unutilized ITC used in making zero rated supplies of services without payment of IGST was allowed.
SC in Gagandeep Singh v. Union of India & Ors. admitted Writ and issued notice to Revenue Department, challenging GST provisions pertaining to power to arrest and power to summon.
