ITAT Delhi held that towards unexplained money u/s. 69A of the Income Tax Act merely on the basis of unsigned unexecuted draft agreement to sale without any other collaborative evidence is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Mumbai held that that loss arising due to embezzlement by the employees should be treated as incidental to the business such loss so suffered is allowable as deduction under section 28 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi deleted TP adjustment on payment of model fee for export to AEs stating that scope of TPO is limited to determination of arm’s length price and TPO cannot adjudge commercial expediency of a transaction.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act initiated on a mere change of opinion without any fresh tangible material unsustainable in law.
Allahabad High Court held that proceedings under section 129(1)(b) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is bad when the owner of the goods comes forward to pay the penalty.
CESTAT Mumbai held that demand alleging undervaluation of imported goods merely on the basis of retracted statements without corroborative evidences is unsustainable in law.
Exploring the key details of the GKN Driveline (India) Ltd vs CCE case at CESTAT Chandigarh, and its impact on the reversal of Cenvat Credit under Rule 3(5B).
Analyzing the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on Bayer Vapi Pvt Ltd. vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman case, focusing on Cenvat re-credit, suo moto reversal, and legal implications.
Analysis of the Shiv Charan Vs ITO case by ITAT Delhi, where a fresh adjudication was ordered on income tax addition u/s 68, focusing on procedural fairness.
Understanding the ITAT Hyderabad decision in Durga Prasad Sana Vs ITO. Why foreign assignment allowances received outside India aren’t taxed in India.
