ITAT Bangalore held that as income is estimated under section 44AD of the Income Tax Act, so addition under section 68/69A of the Income Tax Act is impermissible.
CESTAT Allahabad held that as per provisions of section 35C(1A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 granting of adjournment beyond three times is unjustifiable. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution in terms of Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982
Get insights into GST implications on water supply activities. Understand SAC code 996921 and applicable 18% GST rate. Read the AAR Haryana ruling.
BCITS Pvt Ltd (GST AAR Haryana) provides taxable services, including water billing software and database maintenance, to Municipal Corporation Gurugram.
CESTAT Delhi held that absolute confiscation of the gold and imposition of penalty thereon justifiable on account of illicit smuggling of gold without any valid documents.
ITAT Raipur held that condonation of inordinate delay of 191 days in filing of an appeal cannot be condoned without any justifiable reason. Accordingly, condonation not granted due to lack of sufficient cause.
ITAT Jaipur held that penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act not leviable as the assessee is eligible to avail the benefit of presumptive taxation up to Rs. 2 Crores as per section 44D of the Income Tax Act.
A recent CESTAT Kolkata ruling clarifies that copyright services related to original artistic works are exempt from service tax under Section 65(zzzzt) of Finance Act.
A recent CESTAT Kolkata ruling on service tax liability clarifies that works contracts with material supply are not liable for service tax before June 1, 2007.”
ITAT Bangalore held that as assessee has no right to receive the interest accrued on Fixed Deposits due to prohibitory order, the same is not taxable.
