In the Subba Raju Chekuri Vs. ITO case, ITAT Hyderabad remands matter due to the failure of the assessee to provide evidence for Section 54F deduction claim.
CESTAT Kolkata drops Service Tax demand for HUDCO Construction services due to non-commercial project nature. Learn more on the case of Uttam Chand Sethia and its implications on this blog post!
Madras High Court’s ruling: Consumers can’t file complaints against the Revenue Department for excessive GST levied by hotel managements. Learn more here.
The Commissioner of Customs vs. Axis Shipping Agency case: CESTAT Kolkata rules issuance of show cause notice under Section 124 of Customs Act for Customs Broker license void ab initio.
CESTAT Chandigarh overrules appeal dismissal as time-barred in the case of Art N Glass vs. C.C Ludhiana, emphasizing compliance with the Customs Act’s prescribed timeframe.
In an income tax penalty case, ITAT Chennai dismisses the appeal, upholding that advances received by Dr. M.N. Kumaresan constitute gifts and are exempt from penalty under section 271D.
The Calcutta High Court remands an Income Tax reassessment order due to the denial of the right to cross-examine a witness, citing a violation of natural justice principles.
Read about ITAT’s decision to allow bonus deduction under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act for Adani Power Ltd. for Assessment Year 2019-20.
The Delhi High Court confirms the annulment of an assessment order in the case of PCIT vs. Anuj Bansal, citing mechanical approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act.
CESTAT Chandigarh rules in favor of Souvenior Ceramics, granting exemption from excise duty for castable refractory goods supplied to power projects. Detailed analysis here.
