Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Souvenior Ceramics Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Souvenior Ceramics Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh)

Introduction: In the case of M/s Souvenir Ceramics, a manufacturing company specializing in castable refractory goods, we delve into a complex scenario where they filed a refund claim for Rs.1,45,742 against Central Excise duty payments made in error. Their argument hinges on two key aspects: first, that their supplies were against International Competitive Bidding and should thus be exempt under Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031