CESTAT Bangalore rules in Rafeek K.T. vs Commissioner of Customs case: Retracted statements without corroborative evidence deemed inadmissible.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules on CENVAT credit eligibility. Intas Pharmaceuticals allowed to claim credit based on law at service receipt, not credit availing date.
Understand the condonation of delay imposed by the Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Standard Chartered Grindlays Pty Ltd. Learn about the penalty imposed and the background of the appeal under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Explore ITAT Pune’s order in Sangli Kutch Jain Seva Samaj vs. CIT. Trust registration u/s 12AA rejected; discrepancies found. ITAT directs re-adjudication.
Explore CESTAT Ahmedabad’s decision in Archna Traders vs. C.C.E. & S.T. on denial of VCES Scheme benefit under Section 106 of Finance Act 2013. Full analysis here.
Delhi High Court’s verdict on reassessment under Section 153A of Income Tax Act without incriminating material. Analysis and legal implications. Learn more.
Kerala High Court orders consideration of condonation application for 234 days delay in an appeal against rejection of FTC claim. Learn more in this analysis.
ITAT Chennai upholds income tax addition due to failure in explaining the source of a significant cash deposit in a bank account. Learn more in this analysis.
Allahabad High Court rules in favor of a family’s claim for insurance money under the UPVAT Act after the registered dealer’s death, stating registration must be valid on the date of death.
CESTAT Kolkata quashes the rejection of a refund claim on Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid for shoe imports, citing non-inclusion of an allegation in the show cause notice.
