ITAT held that when competent authority issued Form 3CL, which validated assessee’s claim for a deduction that included both capital and revenue expenditure, the departmental authorities could not deny assessee section 35(2AB) deduction.
CESTAT Allahabad dismisses appeal due to delay in filing beyond 30 days, citing statutory limitations. Detailed analysis of the ruling’s implications.
Gujarat High Court rules that non-consideration of reply and violation of natural justice in GST DRC-7 order requires a fresh hearing. Details and implications.
Read about the Delhi High Court’s decision in Asian Hotels Ltd vs. CIT, where ITAT allowed deductions for renovation, refurbishment, and professional fees.
CESTAT Ahmedabad quashes Central Excise duty demand on petroleum fuels extraction, citing absence of a speaking order. Detailed analysis and implications.
CESTAT Ahmedabad allows CENVAT credit for the supplier of Rotogravure Printing Cylinders who had paid excise duty correctly. In-depth analysis of the case.
CESTAT Chennai dismisses the Customs department’s appeal due to its failure to prove delay in receiving the order from the Review Cell. Detailed analysis of the case.
ITAT Chennai directs the AO to reduce the addition for unexplained cash deposits in Canara Bank by the assessee. Detailed analysis of the case and its implications.
Explore Delhi High Court’s judgment on PCIT vs VE Commercial Vehicles Ltd, AY 2011-12. Bad debts and training expenses considered. Full analysis here.
Read the CESTAT Ahmedabad’s order in Vidyut Corporation vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman, where excise duty demands, interest, and penalties are deemed unsustainable due to a mere wrong mention of registration in payment.
