The court emphasizes that the petitioner received eight notices under Section 142(1) and two show cause notices under Section 144. Despite ample opportunities, the petitioner did not respond or seek extensions. The court concludes that the petitioner cannot now claim a violation of natural justice, as there was substantial compliance.
Allahabad High Court judgment on Desai Brothers Limited Ratanpur vs. State of U.P. highlights Section 54, emphasizing interest remittance 60 days post refund application.
Read about the Kerala High Court’s dismissal of a writ petition seeking restoration of a Customs appeal. The court found the petition misconceived and not maintainable.
Krishna Traders Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad): Transaction value cannot be rejected on mere assumption/presumption and against provisions of Section 14 of Customs Act read with Rule 8 of Valuation rules
Read the Kerala High Court judgment on Parameswaran E. C. vs Assistant Commissioner, where writ petition challenging GST assessment orders is disposed of, allowing the petitioner to appeal within a month.
Explore the CESTAT Hyderabad decision directing the release of gold bars seized as smuggled goods in Mitta Sunil Kumar vs Commissioner of Customs case. Learn about the legal arguments and outcome.
Telangana High Court’s landmark decision in M/s. A.S.E. India v. Union of India, highlighting invalidity of blocking ITC without a CGST Act Section 74 order or Rule 86A compliance.
NCLT Delhi’s landmark judgment in Agson Global vs. Prodalim B.V clarifies its role in settlement payments. Breach doesn’t trigger CIRP. Full order text included.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai order in Sujeev Sanjeev Kharwadkar Vs ACIT case. Learn how the ITAT allows deduction under section 24 for interest expenditure in Income Tax Act.
Explore the Kerala High Court’s decision in the case of Global Plasto Wares vs. Assistant State Tax Officer. Analysis of penalties under Section 73(11) of CGST/SGST Act and implications for businesses.
