The applicant, M/s. Arihant Hostel, No.66/1, Dr. Jaganatha Nagar, 7th cross, opposite CMC, Coimbatore – 641014 (herein after referred to as The Applicant), is unregistered with GST. The Applicant is running a Mens residential hostel for college students and working people.
The applicant, M/s. Snegithi Ladies Hostel and Catering, D 28, Pollachi Road, Eachanari, Coimbatore – 641001 (herein after referred to as The Applicant), is registered under the GST Act, 2017, with GSTIN 33ANRPY7323E1ZM. The Applicant is running a ladies residential hostel for college students and working people.
The applicant, M/s. Shiva Residency, No.8, PKD Nagar, Peelamedu, Coimbatore – 641 004 (herein after referred to as The Applicant), is registered under the GST Act, 2017, with GSTIN 33AAUPL3828R2ZT. The Applicant is running a ladies residential hostel for college students and working people.
The applicant, M/s. Senora Ladies Hostel, No.337-A, Trichy Road, Singanallur, Coimbatore – 641 005 (herein after referred to as The Applicant), is registered under the GST Act, 2017, with GSTIN 33AWWPM5291R1ZD. The Applicant is running a ladies residential hostel for college students and working people.
M/s. Aathira Ladies Hostel, No. 131, Manis Nest, Bharathiyar Road, P.N.Palayam, Coimbatore – 641 037 (herein after referred to as The Applicant), is registered with GST with a registration number 33AGNP,J0656,J1ZB. The Applicant is running a ladies residential hostel for college students and working people.
Read detailed analysis of Delhi High Court judgment in Indian Oil Corporation Limited vs. Commissioner of CGST. Understand ITC refund eligibility under inverted duty structure.
Explore ITAT Delhi’s ruling in DCIT vs. Creamy Foods Ltd regarding addition of unexplained cash during a search operation. Learn about explanation provided by assessee.
Explore the Shiva TexFabs Ltd. vs. State of Punjab case. Learn how Punjab & Haryana High Court reduced pre-deposit under VAT Act due to financial hardship, setting a precedent.
Dive into an income tax appeal against Commissioner’s order. Explore discrepancies, disputed additions, and ITAT Raipur’s direction for reexamination.
Explore Delhi High Court’s nuanced judgment in PCIT vs. Future First Info. Services Pvt. Ltd., emphasizing KPO exclusion in transfer pricing analysis.
