CESTAT Allahabad rules in Jalan Con Cast Ltd. vs. Commissioner case. Detailed analysis on department’s power to retain deposited amount under protest.
Explore the Madras High Court’s ruling on Section 248’s inapplicability to dividend declarations. Detailed analysis and implications of the judgment.
HC acknowledged that, per Rule 142 of the CG&ST Rules, 2017, the issuance of Forms GST DRC-01 and GST DRC-01A is a statutory requirement. These forms precede the issuance of an order under Section 73 of the CG&ST Act. The court emphasized that non-compliance with Rule 142 amounted to a violation of the petitioner’s rights.
Central issue revolved around assessee’s claim for deduction under Section 54F for investing sale proceeds of shares in a residential flat purchased in the name of his minor daughter.
Explore Delhi High Court’s ruling on Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act in Valley Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. vs. PCIT. Detailed analysis and implications of the judgment.
Assessee-company who was an exporter of rice and other agricultural products, received an Order from its overseas buyer M/s Indi Sino Trade Pte Ltd for the sale of 40,000 MT of rice which was to be exported from Kandla Port in Gujarat.
ITAT Mumbai held that foreign exchange loss incurred by the assessee attributable to purchase of material is revenue expenditure and it cannot be included in the cost of project. Accordingly, the same is allowable as deduction.
ITAT Chennai held that the assessment order passed by the AO is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue, because, the issue of exemption u/s.11 of the Act, has been considered by the AO while completing assessment u/s.143(3) of the Act. Thus, order passed by the CIT(Exemptions) u/s.263 of the Act unsustainable.
Explore Delhi High Court’s decision allowing the revenue to challenge Black Money Act proceedings in PCIT vs. Ashok Kumar Singh. Detailed analysis of the judgment.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgment on CIT – International Taxation, highlighting the invalidity of invoking S. 263 without satisfying twin conditions. Full analysis and implications.
