CESTAT clarifies service tax demands cannot be based solely on ITR or 26AS statements. The department must prove service provision, recipient, and consideration. This decision upholds consistent rulings and protects businesses from unsubstantiated demands.
CESTAT directed the customs department to deliver a certified copy of their final order to Vedanta Limited following proper procedures. This ensures Vedanta receives the order and can exercise their appeal rights.
CESTAT Chennai rules redemption fine cannot exceed market value in Vinayaga Traders vs Commissioner of Customs case, setting precedent for import disputes.
Discover why the AAR cannot issue rulings on matters outside CGST Act 2017, Section 97(2), through the case of Srinivasa Constructions India Pvt. Ltd.
Dive into the details of Changejar Technologies Pvt. Ltd’s GST AAR in Karnataka. Learn about their classification as an e-commerce operator, tax obligations, and more.
Kerala High Court quashes an Income Tax assessment order against We Connect Agencies for not providing a hearing, emphasizing fair trial rights.
Explore the Delhi High Court judgment in CIT Vs S.A. Chitra Ventures Ltd. Understand the limitations on AO’s jurisdiction without income variation in draft assessment orders.
Read the Delhi High Court’s judgment in Delhi Polymers Vs Commissioner regarding retrospective cancellation of GST registration and the directive for cancellation from the issuance date of the Show Cause Notice.
Explore the detailed analysis of L&T Hydrocarbon Engineerings GST appeal in Rajasthan, covering EPC contracts, infrastructure facilities, and the 18% GST dispute.
Explore the details of the appeal by Kalpataru Projects International Limited regarding the classification of construction services under GST. Learn about the ruling modifications and its impact.
