Read the detailed analysis of the Allahabad High Court’s decision to grant bail to Qamar Ahmed Kazmi accused of availing excess input tax credit under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC.
CESTAT Allahabad rules that payment of VAT/Sales Tax on deemed sales does not automatically exclude the transaction from service tax liability.
Delhi High Court rules cash, excluded from goods definition, can’t be seized under GST Act. Full text judgment of Bansal vs Union of India.
In a landmark decision, ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, stating that a fraud mobile number cannot deny tax treaty benefits. Full text of the order included.
Delve into the detailed analysis of DCIT Vs AD2PRO Media Solutions Pvt. Ltd. case where marketing services rendered by a US entity in India were deemed not taxable, offering insights into tax benefits.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules service recipients in India not liable for service tax when the foreign service provider has a permanent establishment in India.
CAAR Mumbai rules Clean Bio Zinc (NSP) falls under CTH 38089290, highlighting its use in anti-dandruff shampoos and as a fungicide. Discover the full analysis.
CESTAT rules against imposing penalties on Amglo Resources Pvt Ltd for alleged COO misdeclaration, emphasizing the need for mens rea proof.
CESTAT Ahmedabad imposes penalties under Customs Act for fraudulent MEIS benefit claim by Fashion Accessories, highlighting stringent legal consequences.
Delhi High Court rules GST assessment order invalid if it doesn’t meet Section 74’s requirements. The case highlights the importance of legal compliance.
