Allahabad High Court held that valid service of notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act is a condition precedent for making reassessment under section 147. Accordingly, non-service of notice on registered email ID is unsustainable in the eyes of law.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Ecokrin Hygiene Pvt. Ltd., deleting additions under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act solely based on the expiration of the limitation period.
ITAT Delhi ruling: Loan advanced for repayment of business operation liabilities considered allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Assessing Officer computed a disallowance under section 14A concerning non-current investments. However, the assessee had not claimed any exempt income. Citing relevant legal precedents, the Tribunal dismissed the disallowance, affirming that section 14A was inapplicable in the absence of exempt income.
Read how Kerala HC granted interim exemption to a mother for importing medicine for her child suffering from SMA, exempting her from payment of IGST.
ITAT emphasized that the AO must decide on the objections raised by the assessee before proceeding with the assessment. Failure to do so renders the assessment bad in law.
Discover the implications of Rajesh Mittal vs Union of India case on GST proceedings. Learn why Central GST Authoritys actions were halted when State GST Authority initiated proceedings.
The Bombay High Court in Siemens India Ltd. v. Union of India holds that Input Service Distributors’ entitlement to transition Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be denied due to procedural lapses.
Jammu & Kashmir HC held that that it was not open to the respondent-Enforcement Directorate to proceed against the petitioner in respect of offences under PMLA once the FIR in respect of the predicate offences had been stayed by the High Court.
Madras High Court held that Tax Recovery Officer is not required to declare the sale between the petitioner and the fourth respondent as invalid as the sale is void abinito. Thus, court directed petitioner to institute suit in a civil court to establish right over disputed property.
