Merely, because a taxpayer has not filed GST returns for some period does not mean that taxpayer’s registration is required to be cancelled with retrospective date also covering the period when the returns were filed, and taxpayer was compliant.
Mumbai ITAT orders stamp duty valuation on allotment letter date for Section 56(2)(x) of Income Tax Act, setting aside CIT(A) order against Assessee.
Delhi High Court overturns retrospective GST registration cancellation due to lack of details in notice and order, orders modification from date of notice.
Impugned GST order dismissed petitioner’s reply as unsatisfactory and lacking substantial documents. court highlighted absence of any request for further details from petitioner, indicating a failure to engage with submitted reply effectively.
Detailed analysis of P.Jeyaraman Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) case where Madras HC orders disposal of application for Revocation of GST registration cancellation
Delhi High Court rules that an ex-parte order cannot stand if the taxpayer’s GSTN is cancelled, hindering response. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
Since the appellant hadn’t filed the appeal through the Interim Resolution Professional as required under the resolution process, the ITAT deemed the appeal not maintainable and dismissed it.
In re L S Metal Vina LLC (CAAR New Delhi) – CAAR cannot give ruling where there is an ongoing investigation or assessment has been made on provisional basis
CAAR Mumbai held that Raw Silicon Carbide Bricks for DPI application merit classification under Custom Tariff Heading 6902, more specifically under CTH 6902 2040 of First Schedule of Customs Tariff Act, 1975
Read the full text of the judgment/order by Allahabad High Court regarding the unauthorized search and seizure in the case of Gaurav Saurav Traders.
