Gopikrishna Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Vs State of Jharkhand (Jharkhand High Court) Contractors are entitled to reimbursement of the GST impact also on indirect transactions on which GST was imposed.
HC emphasized that if respondent intended to modify tax proposal, a fresh show cause notice should have been issued instead of deviating from original basis without proper notice.
Analysis of N.R. Patel & Co. Vs Assistant Commissioner case by Kerala High Court. Court rules on assessment/refund order merit under KGST Act. Full judgment.
Explore how the Supreme Court’s ruling reinforces strict adherence to refund timelines under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act in the case of Commissioner vs FEMC Pratibha JV.
Orissa High Court quashes reassessment order, ruling it cannot be based merely on tax evasion or audit reports, stressing the need for independent assessment.
ITAT observed that the disallowance of expenses by the AO was on an estimate and ad hoc basis due to the absence of supporting evidence, rather than evidence of concealment of income. Referring to legal precedents, the ITAT emphasized that disallowance based on the magnitude of expenses or missing vouchers is insufficient to justify a penalty, especially without evidence of mala fide intent.
ITAT Mumbai rules penalty under Section 270A deleted as I-T authority failed to consider reasons for difference in sale consideration and stamp duty valuation.
Delhi High Court directs reconsideration of refund application in Rahul Packaging Vs Union of India case. Find out how an incompetent authority issuing a Show Cause Notice impacted the judgment.
Delhi High Court quashes proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act initiated for reassessment in Akshita Jindal Vs ITO case. Detailed analysis and judgment.
Delhi High Court directs re-adjudication of a CGST Act order due to lack of natural justice principles. Full text of the judgment provided.
