Electrosteel Steels Ltd. Vs Commr. of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) All the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Government or any local authority, if not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which […]
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs Sanjay Sharma (Madhya Pradesh HC) HC held that for cancelling the bail once granted the Court must consider whether any supervening circumstances have arisen or at the stage of post-grant of bail the conduct of accused demonstrate that it is no longer conducive to a fair trial to permit him […]
HC held that as order not assign any reason for cancelling GST registration and is passed only on the ground that reply to show cause notice is not given. Non-submission of reply to SCN cannot be a ground for cancellation of registration.
PCIT Vs Padma Kumar Jain (Jharkhand High Court) Section 263 revision initiated by CIT second time to cancelling non existing original assessment order isn’t tenable: PCIT v. Padma Kumar Jain – [2022] (Jharkhand) A search and seizure operation was conducted by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the business and residential premises of the assessee-individual. After […]
Marvelore Mining & Allied Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) Sec. 41(1) can’t be invoked for liability against purchase of defective machinery that was never put to use: Marvelore Mining & Allied Industries (P.) Ltd. v. ITO – [2023] (Surat-Trib.) Assessee was a private limited company. It was engaged in the business of Calcium […]
Advocate J S Bedi Jagraon Multi Metals Vs State of Punjab (Punjab & Haryana High Court) Interim order passed by Honb. Punjab & Haryana High Court against the confiscation of goods directly u/s 130 on the ground that subsequent seller has not deposited the tax That three vehicles were detained by State Tax Officer Ludhiana […]
Section 273B of the Act, squarely applies and since assessee has a reasonable cause for not getting books of account audited, he should not be visited by penalty u/s 271B
The goods imported such as main PCB, lightning protector, DC/AC cables, fuse holders are neither parts nor accessories of Integrated Fixed Wireless Telephones ( IFWT )could not be considered as accessory as these parts were not used to increase the effectiveness or convenience of IFWT. Therefore, the goods imported were neither parts nor accessories of IFWT and therefore could not avail the benefit of notification for Customs duty exemption.
Commission received from the financial institution towards sale of their loan product is liable to Service Tax
Casual approach of Commissioner State Taxes cannot be permitted since he is trying only to prevent payment of refund amount to petitioner.
